Wednesday, January 12, 2011

More Zman Chofesi Please? The Never-Ending Debate of Privileges at Camp



Camp, like any organization, functions properly because everyone has a specific role, each with its own responsibilities. The upper staff and administration spend the entire year planning for the summer; the counselors, roshei aydah, teachers and staff represent the workforce of the camp; the Kerem are the “emotional” leaders, the group that other campers look up to and want to be; and the campers are the reason that the camp exists in the first place. Within each group, there exists a purpose that the members strive to achieve. However, I have come to notice that there is often a breakdown of communication that exists between the different staff categories, causing a lot of unnecessary strife, reproach, and bitterness.

At some point during the summer there is almost always a significant breakdown in communication between Kerem and the upper staff. There are few meetings that require both of these groups together,, and when they do happen, they are usually for a specific purpose. Debbie Sussman, over the past few years, has spent an hour each month on Shabbat afternoon talking with the kids about topics they care about. In these meetings, Kerem campers have the ability to raise any camp-related concerns and issues they might have . There is no question that this is a step in the right direction; however, these short meetings represent only a snippet of the kids’ true perspectives. The counselors and rosh play a critical role when it comes to the communication between these two groups, however debate over a particular issue usually erupts when either side doesn’t understand the other’s point of view. The upper staff might the decide something that upsets the campers, leaving the counselors and rosh stuck in the middle: is their role to support the desires and needs of their campers or, as employees of the camp, are they the bearers of upper staff’s decisions?

What exactly is it that upsets kids so extensively, and with such predictability each and every year? Well if you didn’t read the title of the post, I will tell you: privileges. Every year, no matter what, kids expect to have more privileges by the end of the summer. In particular, they expect to have the things that they “thought” that they saw past Kerems get because that is what they were “promised”.  One example of this comes from a member of K’08:

“One negative thing about Kerem was the way in which upper staff would react to our role in camp. At the beginning of the summer they would always say, "If you are good, you will get more privileges," but I felt that couldn’t have been farther from the truth. After consistently showing ourselves as strong leaders of the camp, we were never rewarded (at least in the ways that former Kerems were). Even after a member of our aydah was kicked out, we responded without disrupting camp's normal flow, and were never once commended on how maturely we handled the situation as an aydah.”

The following demonstrates another mentality typical of campers entering their Kerem summer. This is from a conversation with someone who will be in Kerem ‘11.

Some privileges that I am expecting are more freedom and trust from both upper staff and counselors...I think that we should be able to have as many BBQ’s as the older Kerems had…Its a bonding time between both the aydah and the counselors.”

For me, after living on the waterfront for years, this sentiment is in no way unique. This is how campers in Kerem feel about their privileges. The problem is that campers are misled into thinking this logic is true, when in fact, they are mistaken in thinking there are “promised privileges” in the first place. Upper staff usually contends that
A)   they never promise any increase of privileges at the end of the summer besides extended curfew during Macccabiah  The kids are often drawn into this logical fallacy when their counselors mistakenly make a promise they can’t fulfill. They say, ”You will get more things at the end of the summer,” as a way to rebuke the kids at the beginning, but have to deal with angry and upset kids at the end when the promise is left unfulfilled.
B)   The current Kerem almost always have an inaccurate understanding of how previous Kerems were rewarded. They remember mostly the last week - when Kerem is up late at night for Maccabiah - not the first seven weeks when they have to be in the bunks by 1030. Both upper staff and Kerem have valid perspectives, but since only one side makes the rules, the other feels immense frustration and vents to their counselors who have absolutely no control in the matter.

It is clear to me that this situation needs to be remedied, because the same exact problem happens every year. Nobody is happy with the situation as it currently stands: Upperstaff is improperly blamed for reneging on promises they never made, campers become angry and combative toward the administration and counselors, and the counselors and roshei aydah are stuck in the middle as the intermediaries, an impossible position to please anyone.

What do I propose to remedy this predictably unstable situation? A contract. The upper staff and the Kerem rosh would create this contract at the outset of the summer, outlining the expectations of the upper staff for Kerem and also acknowledging the outcome if Kerem follows throughand meets the agreed-upon expectations. What are some of the things that upper staff would require of Kerem? For starters: good behavior, good attitude, and commitment to the mission of the camp,but should also include something that can be qualitatively measured like programming. If Kerem is able to complete their tasks, they should be rewarded.I have been told before that this idea is juvenile because Kerem shouldn’t have to be rewarded for something they should inherently want to do. However, from Gurim to Kerem, upper staff uses the idea of reward-based incentives to entice campers to complete certain tasks, for instance, cleaning the bunk. After 5 straight 10’s in Nikayon, the bunk is rewarded with an ice cream party, after 10, a late wake up, and after 15, a movie in the bunk. There is no question that this is the motivating factor in keeping the bunks spotless each morning. They know that if they succeed, they will be rewarded. In fact, this works for Kerem as well.  The prizes are a little different, (they were given steaks instead of the other prizes) but given enough motivation, the task will be completed[1]. Kerem, throughout the whole summer, has many more responsibilities than simply cleaning the bunk each morning. And in order to succeed, motivation is crucial. This motivation should be two-fold; it should specify the reward in exchange for meeting a goal, but should also encourage Kerem to feel proud of their accomplishments, . There is no question that an agreement at the beginning of the summer would make the campers more positive, enthusiastic, and motivated, and would prevent the common negative interactions with upper staff and tug-of-war effect on the counselors.. A win-win and win situation.





[1] It is important to note that after they were given the steaks (with 3 weeks left of the summer) their cleaning habits disintegrated and it was almost impossible to entice the kids to do a thorough cleaning.

6 comments:

  1. Yoni--while I certainly agree that the discrepancy between Kerem's expectations and reality is a problem, I don't think a contract is the solution.
    First of all, Kerem would definitely be upset by the terms of the contract because, as you mention, they always think that previous Kerems got a lot more privileges than they do. Having a contract in which upper staff describes what will actually happen during the summer in terms of privileges may upset the Kerem and hurt relations from the outset.
    Second, under your system, upper staff builds incentives into the contract based on subjective expectations such as good behavior. I'm sure upper staff and Kerem have very different views on what these expectations would mean. Kerem would most likely feel that upper staff is reneging on their promises, even though upper staff could think that the requirements have not been met. In this case, these are promises upper staff actually did make. I think this may strain relations even further

    ReplyDelete
  2. Zach-

    Thanks for your comments. I certainly appreciate when people disagree because it allows for greater conversation.

    You make two good points. For your first argument you say that Kerem will be upset if they think that previous Kerems got more privileges, and therefore a contract would expose this. In response, I think regardless if there is a contract or not Kerem will only get what upper staff dictates, the fact that the kids will wait until the end of the summer to learn this will just make it that much worse. It kinda of goes back to the secrets article. We need to be more transparent so the kids know what to expect. If they know they wont get crazy late curfew, they wont expect it and even though they might be upset at the beginning, the intensity wont be nearly as high as at the end.

    Secondly you said that because of the different views of the both parties, upperstaff could renege if they dont think they accomplished the goals where Kerem might think they did. You're right. Behavior, attitude etc, are very subjective and determining them might be a nightmare. I guess my response to this is that the formality of the contract will be such that unless Kerem really does something bad then they will most likely get everything that was promised. If a contract had be set up in the in previous Kerem i can not think of a Kerem since 2003 that did not deserve every privilege that they 'rightfully' deserved. This just sets up a way for the Kerem kids to know what they will get, and they know in the back of their minds they are being judged as well.

    Thanks again Zach, I look forward to hearing your response, and anyone else who is opinionated.

    Yoni

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yoni--

    After reading your response to my first point, I agree with you. I think I was caught up in the whole counselor culture of keeping secrets and the idea that it's best to hide potentially negative things from the kids, and I ignored your point about transparency.

    As for the second point, I still think it's an issue. If all the rewards in the contract always materialize, than it would be hard to for upper staff to take them away as punishments because there is still the issue of Kerems knowing what was done in previous years. At the same time, if the incentives are difficult to earn, the same problem of subjective terms would arise. Do you think just having the contract itself, even if it is just a fromality, would change anything?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Zach-

    Sorry for being so delayed to your post. To answer you question, I guess what I am looking for isn't change in the privileges granted to Kerem. I fully expect Kerem to earn everything that was orginially promised (through a contract) to them. What the contract does by us is the transparency and the knowledge of what will come. They will not be asking and bugging the counselors when will they get curfew extended, because it will be already established. Maybe contract is not a good word. How about a written 'agreement'? Is that better?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think having a camp contract in general goes against everything "camp" - and this moves forward to your tradition post, I think. Yes, it may make some things easier, but camp is not mean for written contracts. Negotiations are made, Kerem has a chance to stand up for themselves and argue what they believe in, and dialogue is the best place for people to grow. The solution may never come, but, the true "meaning" here comes from interaction, not written statements that can't be changed.

    It's great that you're proposing a solution, but I think the actual solution comes from Kerem themselves. Let them have a chance to lay out their expectations, sit down, discuss where they're at, allow them to become diplomatic and true leaders by figuring out how to talk to Upper Staff.

    Contracts ( / anything written in stone) only make for campers with little room to grow. Leaders arise from discussion.

    Regardless, I think this is a fascinating topic; one that should continue to be talked about. Next time we're back home, Yoni ;)

    ReplyDelete