Thursday, April 7, 2011

Making Camp a Safer Space: Sex, Gender, Language, and the Value of Respect (3/4)

Beyond individual KTV skits or songs, sexism is sometimes built into camp traditions. For the past few years, for example, our camp has had an annual Powderpuff football game. Superficially, Powderpuff seems to challenge traditional gender roles, with boys cheerleading while girls play football. But if you look deeper, three aspects of the game suggest that the tradition reinforces, rather than challenges, gender norms. First, the boys mostly treat it as a joke. They are dressed up as female cheerleaders on the sidelines (more on this below) and laugh when the girls playing do something stupid or wrong. The mindset is one of entertainment rather than serious support. Second, boys still retain the power. Who coaches? Who runs the practices? Who sets the plays? Who makes all of the decisions? As with grilling, male campers retain the power to grant special, limited access to their otherwise all-male world of football. Finally, the boys’ dressing up emphasizes the notion that in order to be cheerleaders, they have to feminize themselves by wearing girls’ clothes. “Real” boys still cannot be cheerleaders. I say all of this to point out that that if you delve a little deeper, it’s not difficult to recast the ritual as sexist and offensive.

In its current form, Powderpuff is not a game that should happen at Yavneh. What can be done? A first simple step is to get rid of the name. Powderpuff in general has negative associations. Why can’t we just call it girls playing football? Does it really need a special distinction? Second, I would advocate for girls to play football often and early. Assign girls football in kfirim, and have an experienced female counselor lead it. It doesn’t have to be perfect, but learning the rules, and playing the game is a fun alternative to kickball. In addition, let’s have more sports games where girls from different aydot can play against, and with, each other. It happens all the time for the boys on Shabbat, why can’t it for the girls as well? In fact, on Shabbat, boys should be a lot more actively inclusive, because there are usually little to no opportunities for girls to play sports. and Finally, I want to challenge the girls and their counselors to care about taking ownership of Powderpuff. Let’s have female coaches who run the practices and design the plays. Boys are not the ones playing the game. The girls are.

Even more serious than Powderpuff, though, is the lack of respect that male campers and counselors sometimes give to the girls and women at camp. I have already given a few examples of this earlier, but one more example particularly sticks out for me. I remember distinctly sitting in the roshes’ room, brainstorming with a female rosh aydah about how she could be and act more authoritative. She said that whenever she would tell a certain male camper what to do, that camper would either laugh at her, or completely ignore her as if she had no authority to discipline him or any boy campers. Furthermore, she described how the male madrichim did nothing and refused to step in and back her up. She hated how she had to go to her co-rosh for things as small as telling kids to be quiet during Birkat Hamazon. Such a status quo is unacceptable, and we can start to change it by expecting male madrichim to set an example by respecting female roshei aydah. If they do not, they need to be dealt with and spoken to every single time. By passively standing by and watching a Rosh discipline, counselors are not actively doing their jobs.

It is somewhat ironic that I spent the last few pages of this blog entry only addressing boy-girl subjects but advocating against heternormativity. Camp is and will continue to confront issues of homosexuality and transgender. Right now, the policy at camp leaves much room for improvement. It certainly is not an easy subject to create rules around, but camp needs to have a policy that does not hurt, discourage, demean, or ruin any campers’ experience because of the way they identify. In my opinion, campers can and should be expected to be accepting and inclusive. However, this is not to say that there is even a good option of how to handle these situations. Often times, home and school life for these kids can be even worse, and they look forward to camp as a place to go to get away from it all, just like everyone else. However, when it comes down to it, if you identify as anything that isn't purely straight, is camp going to make you feel accepted, both explicitly and implicitly?" I think the answer is a pretty definitive no. We need to figure out how to be a place that is accepting of everyone and eliminate our heteronormative tendencies.

7 comments:

  1. If the girls have a real problem with powder puff, then they should let it be known to others...If they still have fun with it, why get rid of it?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree, powderpuff is a great way to connect with the other aydah's girls, and having participated in it, few of the girls are really qualified to coach, and none of us felt offended in any way that the boys did the work. Also, many high schools have these sorts of traditions between junior and senior girls, and it is one of the most fun days at camp.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous 1 and 2-

    It seems like you guys are making the same two arguments. First, since some/most girls don't have a problem with it or if the girls who do have a problem with don't speak up than there is no problem in the first place. Two, because it is fun and other people do it, we shouldn't get rid of it.

    When it comes down to it, what is the point of Powderpuff? It is for girls to have fun playing football. Thats it. There is certainly nothing wrong with that, and I would hope most people would agree that it needs to happen more. The problem is in the message of how we approach the game. Just because someone doesn't feel offended that the boys control the practices and games doesn't make it right. The status quo right now is to have the boys be completely in charge, and I am trying to challenge that. I think the lessons that the girls can learn if the boys didn't control it can be much more valuable than making sure they learn the minutia of the game they will probably forget anyway, because after all PP is a one time event. Second, just because something is fun and/or high schools do it, doesn't make it necessarily right. Girls playing football, without all of that extra baggage, can be equally or more fun than it is right now. As you hopefully read in my traditions post, I am an advocate for change. Anything that makes camp a better place, even it goes completely against the 'normal tradition' I am totally for it. Lets not hold on to the lofty ideals of saying that because my friends in older aydot did it, it automatically makes it right. It makes it hard when we have been telling people for a few years that PP is a really good thing. Lets break that ideology.

    In addition, there needs to be a conversation about it. If we are still insisting that Maalot and Leviim girls play once a year, lets gather them together, and figure out a way to restructure things. Put everything out on the table and discuss. I am sure their counselors would be surprised at the insightfulness of the campers.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have just a small comment. You mentioned near the end of your post: "It is somewhat ironic that I spent the last few pages of this blog entry only addressing boy-girl subjects but advocating against heternormativity." By addressing boy-girl subjects in the way that you are, though, you *are* indeed addressing issues of heteronormativity, and challenging the camp's heterotormative structure. In other words, the way that I see it, we are challenging heteronormative structures when we challenge strict gender roles, as you are certainly doing here when you talk about "boy-girl subjects," and the gender stereotypes perpetuated by traditions like Powder Puff. Making the camp safe for people on all parts of the gender spectrum does not only involve accepting those who are "gay" or "lesbian" or "transgender." It involves, on a deeper level, challenging the way that we perceive gender and sexuality as strictly dichotomous categories, so that we can further embrace everyone who might exhibit "counter-gender" tendencies into our culture, even if they do not place themselves in an entirely separate sexual/gender category. (e.g. accepting the boy who prefers to sleep with a stuffed animal; accepting the girl who chooses to wear a kippah,or the girl who wants to play football with the boys instead of participating in powder puff, etc.) If we challenge gender stereotypes, as you are, then ultimately we will create a safer space for gay/bi/transgender/etc people, and for everyone who steps even a bit outside their expected sex/gender roles.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Powerpuff is in no way a negative thing at camp. It bons Leviam and Maalot and brings the girls together. Also this past summer Becca Garber helped with teaching Maalot and she is a girl. Its not fair to say boys do this and boys to that. That is the way its done and both years i played i never once though any different. I personally trust the boy counselors to lead us to a win. Its a way for us to bond and build relationships with boy counselors. The guy cheerleaders choose to make it a joke. Also i think you are touching on a bigger issue in society. Powderpuff is a great sport and has a great name and i can say that every camper enjoys playing. Girls can do anything they want at camp, there is no one stopping them but them selves. Also i think in these posts you looked at girls in camp and how they cant do stuff. But your a boy and we have our things that your not apart of. Not that many girls really care about grilling we just want a hot dog. So i think it may seem like a bigger deal then it really is. I enjoyed these posts and the points you made but there just not very problematic.

    On your last paragraph you touched on the idea of people that our transgender. There was some one at came who was and they were burned by Yavneh and put down by them. This is nothing to be afraid of and she needed us to back her up. Camp made her keep it a secret. For him to come since Gurim and not be led in to Kerem because of it is wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi,
    I agree with what you're saying. Camp definitely needs to find a better way to deal with those who fall outside narrowly defined gender roles. True, some campers are able to stray from their defined roles and still be successful at camp. But those individuals are able to be both successful campers and (slightly) non-confromist because, generally, they have more alluring personalities and/or are more charismatic. But these individuals get by because of their personal merit, not that of camp. They are the exception, not the rule. Because the camp population is so self-selecting, there likely is a high rate of attrition among those who don't conform to their expected gender roles, whether in small or large ways. This selection makes the problem you identify seem smaller than it is. Although I think these articles are truthful and an important step in rectifying a problem at camp,
    I disagree with you on two points: first, many of the seemingly society imposed gender paradigms are actually rooted in biology and second, you only mention ways in which girls can "act like boys". Why doesn't gender equality go both ways?
    I'll address each point separately.
    1. There exist innate differences between most males and most females. Studies have indicated that day old baby boys are more intrigued by a mobile, whereas their female counterparts prefer looking at faces. Male primate infants are also similarly more aggressive, and female toddlers played with cars in a study by carefully avoiding accidents while the males in the study played with the same cars by crashing them into one another. (The links to my sources are at the bottom, both articles are quick and interesting and their authors articulate my points far better than I can.)
    These biological differences are translated into camp (and society at large) by assuming boys prefer aggressive sports and girls prefer talking and arts and crafts. I don’t think this paradigm is entirely wrong, as you seem to. It fits most campers, and conformity is inevitably valued (and non-conformity is even more visible) in a system where activities are planned and carried out in groups of 20 campers. The question then becomes how to allow for severe non-conformity, gender related or otherwise, in a residential camp setting such as Yavneh’s.
    2. I don’t know if you only addressed girls adopting traditionally male activities because males have a privileged position at camp to which you’re trying to elevate the females, because there are more highly visible “male” activities and traditions than “female”, both, or neither. But if one wishes to truly level the playing field, males must likewise adopt traditionally feminine mores. These are harder to identify at Yavneh, the most obvious ones (in my opinion) would be adoption of leadership roles even by the “non-leaders”. However, this only applies to Kerem. In the younger aydot, the boys can have more omanut and rikud time scheduled in, but, as my first point indicated, this could very easily lead to unhappy boys. Although I suggested few real prescriptive measures, I think more equality in formal programming is a step in the right direction towards informally enforced gender equality.

    Here are the links:
    http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/baron-cohen05/baron-cohen05_index.html
    http://www.autismresearchcentre.com/docs/papers/2005_BC_PhiKappaPhiForum.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yoni, are you no longer replying to comments? Asking you this question as a comment really limits your choices of answers. But answer anyway. I won't hold any hypocrisy the answer entails against you.

    ReplyDelete